But the judgment of the federal court in Oakland, California, despite being a compromise of sorts, will set the tone for how big tech will work. Epic Games had claimed Apple’s App Store is a monopoly and charges exorbitant fees on games like its Fortnite. For one, the case will be decided by a jury rather than a judge. The verdict in the high-profile Apple vs Epic Games case was not what either side wanted. The fight dates back to August, when Epic added. This trial has key differences that make Epic think it has a shot. One way or another, Apple will at least have to adapt in some countries, with new European Union regulations requiring the company to allow third-party app stores by 2024. After months of preparation, Epic Games will finally take on Apple in court in a trial that could fundamentally change the makeup of the App Store. In its filing, Apple's lawyers claim that the ruling extends beyond Epic Games and "exceeds the district court's authority under Article III, which limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies." Basically, they argue that the court overreached and asked the Supreme Court to acknowledge that and let its App Store go back to business as usual (developers giving but cuts of sales to Apple). The change went into effect last year, and the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the entire injunction this past April. Rogers also stated that Apple wasn't acting like a monopoly but that the company must allow apps to provide their users with third-party payment systems. The lawsuit was a mixed bag for both parties involved: In 2021, US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Epic knowingly violated Apple's rules and the iPhone maker wasn't required to add Fortnite back to its App Store.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |